Friday, May 30, 2008

What Makes Me Gay?

Someone commented an something I had said a while back about my sexuality being a result of life events, and biology and personality. Even though you know I am not a fan dwelling on the way (I made myself insane for years with that question), the person asked if I would elaborate on my comments. I can see that it is only fair if I do so. If I've found an answer that works for me, then I think all of you deserve knowing about it.

I think my orientation is due in large part to biological reasons. Growing up, I had a very melancholy personality. I was quiet, shy, and overly thoughtful among many other related things. Because of my personality, I was often side-lined (sometimes willingly) when it came to interacting in more stereotypically masculine activities, such as hiking, sports, and the like. When I did participate in such activities (AYSO soccer), I was rarely appreciated for my efforts. If I was encouraged, I could tell the coach or team players were obviously lying. Instead I took a large interest in scientific things (masculine, perhaps, but less stereotypically so) and homemaking things. I learned to crochet, cook, and identify plants and animals. Neither of my parents made a serious effort to push me towards more "manly" things.

By the time I was hitting my early teens, this disfavor for "masculine" activities had taken the form of a distinct hate for such activities. I hated the activities because I sucked at them, I hated my peers for excluding me (whether in reality or only perceived), and I hated myself for being sour grapes about it. What I longed for was inclusion and acceptance by the popular male peers in my group, and that was because it was the very thing I lacked.

So, I think it was a delicate developmental process for my sexuality. Because of my biological nature, I was disinclined towards the very things that could have socially defined a straight sexuality for me. Perhaps if US culture were more permissible about what is "stereotypically" masculine, I would not have developed quite the need for contact with male peers my age. Maybe I would be gay, or bi. Maybe not. It is just a thought; but y'all asked.

I think early sexual experiences also have a lot to do with where one ends up on the sexual spectrum. I don't think it categorically makes one one way or another (plenty of guys experiment but don't end up gay and vice versa), but I think for some kids on the edge, such as I was, it can make a big difference. In my mid-teens i became involved with another guy. It was mutual fun, and we did stuff together for several years. It wasn't a real relationship, though, and I think it probably didn't constitute any thing more than animal love. We didn't kiss, we didn't tell each other we loved each other, it was weird.

For some reason, though, I took that relationship as meaning much more than it did. I was devastated when we broke up, but I never lost the taste (so to speak) for "guy." I like girls, I even find them sexually attractive sometimes, but if I am ever sexually intimate with someone again in my life, it will have to with a man. That's just the way I am.

So, there you have it. I don't have the answers; it's all pure conjecture. My reasoning could all be crap. But, it doesn't matter anymore WHY. I like guys, that's not changing, and now I can move on with my life. I hope if you read this, and you are struggling with the "why" question, that you will be able to tell that it's a fruitless question that only distracts you from carrying on with your life.

3 comments:

robert78 said...

That was really inetersting :) I'm glad you posted this. I try to stay on top of the scientific research on homosexuality, and just sexuality in general, but it's hard, and plus, you're right, in the end the thing that matters the most is that we like guys.

I agree about the biological influences, especially if by that you mean genetic influences; defenitely a huge factor imho. Seems like a lot of research also points toward particular hormones and such that can have an influence on development prior to birth. It's interesting stuff, anyway. I'm still up in the air about the importance of early sexual experiences, but I do agree that social factors must play some part.

I can totally empathize with the whole attitude that you developped toward stereotypically masculine activities- I had/have some of that myself.

You seem really self aware or something. Nice post :)

Aek said...

I've always tended towards gender-neutral activities myself. Science, math (although I suppose math can be considered masculine?), music, art. No one ever questioned such things.

In any case, I believe it's a blend, a combination of many factors. To single out one or a few and say "That's it," is parochial. It's far too complex, and hindsight may produce only regret.

Anyway, random musings . . .

James said...

i'd prolly agree with all that. and, it's about as interesting a question to me as, what makes someone straight? lol. :)